Marginal adaptation and mechanical strength of endocrowns with different materials and tooth prepration design: a review / 口腔疾病防治

@#The endocrown, a modified overlay or crown, is considered to have the advantages of adhesive retention and mechanical retention. Marginal adaptation and mechanical strength are common criteria for evaluating endocrowns. This review studied these aspects of endocrowns to guide further clinical application. Results from previous academic studies indicate that endocrowns made of different materials, such as glass-based ceramics, zirconia-based ceramics and resin-based ceramics, exhibit clinically acceptable marginal adaptation. Zirconia is a common dental material, but when used in endocrowns, it tends to present a risk of irreparable tooth root fractures. Compared with products manufactured with zirconia, endocrowns manufactured with resin-based ceramics and glass-based ceramics, such as lithium disilicate ceramics, do not tend to cause irreparable results, such as tooth root fracture, but their mechanical strengths are not as good as those of zirconia. At the same time, the tooth prepration design such as the types of endocrowns, the pulp chamber extension depth and angles, the endocrown thickness can influence the mechanical strength of endocrowns as well. Compared with traditional zirconia, self-glazed zirconia, a new type of material used to restore defective teeth, has the similar elasticity modulus（210 GPa）and better aesthetic advantages, and is suitable for short crown patients with insufficient occlusal space. Further study is warranted to improve the performance of endocrowns made from ceramic materials to prevent root fracture.

Estudio comparativo entre coronas, endocoronas y endocoronas con ausencia de una pared axial ante fuerzas de tracción / Comparative study between crown, endocrown and endocrown without one axial wall after tensile strength

Introducción: Las alternativas de tratamiento de órganos dentales con gran destrucción en su estructura varían, no sólo por el material de restauración, sino también por el valor económico y estético. Dentro de las alternativas existe: corona convencional, endocorona cuyo objetivo principal es la elaboración de una restauradora que evita la colocación de postes intraconducto y endocorona con ausencia de una pared axial (EPA) que se realiza cuando una pared, mesial, distal, vestibular o palatina está ausente. Objetivo: Verificar si la endocorona EPA se comporta de igual manera que las coronas convencionales y endocoronas al medir su resistencia ante fuerzas de tracción. Material y métodos: Treinta premolares fueron tratados endodóncicamente, 10 fueron preparados para recibir una corona convencional (grupo A), 10 para endocorona (grupo B) y 10 para endocorona EPA (grupo C). Se realizaron fuerzas de tracción para obtener el valor máximo en el cual las coronas fallaron. Se realizó una prueba ANOVA para comparar los resultados. Resultados: Al someter a los tres tipos de coronas a fuerzas de tracción los resultados obtenidos fueron: 3.04 ± 0.55 MPa para la corona, 7.08 ± 1.6 MPa para la endocorona y 6.17 ± 1.12 MPa para la endocorona EPA. Conclusiones: No existió diferencia significativa entre la endocorona (7.08 MPa) y la EPA (6.17 MPa), convirtiéndose en una alternativa de tratamiento con buen pronóstico en la práctica diaria (AU)

Introduction: The alternatives of treatment of tooth with excessive wear vary not only by the restoration material but also by the economic and aesthetic value. Among the alternatives there is: conventional crown, endocrown whose main objective is the elaboration of a restorative that avoids the placement of intraconducting posts and endocrown without one axial wall (EPA) that is done when a wall; mesial, distal, vestibular or palatal is absent. Objective: To verify if the (EPA) behaves in the same way as the conventional crown and endocrown when measuring its resistance to tensile strength. Material and methods: 30 premolars were treated endodontically, ten were prepared to receive a conventional crown, 10 for endocrown and 10 for EPA. Tensile strength were performed to obtain the maximum value at which the crowns failed, an ANOVA test was performed to compare the results. Results: When the three types of crowns were subjected to tensile strength, the results obtained were; 3.04 ± 0.55 MPa for the crown, 7.08 ± 1.6 MPa for the endocrown and 6.17 ± 1.12 MPa for the EPA endocrown. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the endocrown (7.08 MPa) and EPA endocrown (6.17 MPa) becoming an alternative treatment with good prognosis in daily practice (AU)

Effects of the different materials and thicknesses on endocrown stress distribution / 口腔疾病防治

Objective@#To analyze the effects of different restorations and the thickness of the occlusal space on the stress distribution of endodontically treated molars with endocrowns.@*Methods @# The finite element model of the restoration of the first mandibular molar was created, and four different endocrown materials were used including two resin based ceramics (Lava Ultimate, Vita Enamic), one lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD) and one zirconia ceramics (Cercon), and four kinds of surface space thickness were designed: 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm. A total of 600 N was loaded to simulate the maximum bite force in the vertical and inclined directions, and the finite element software ANSYS 10.0 was used to analyze the stress distribution@*Results@#The vertical loading analysis showed that the crown stress of the 1 mm-Cercon group was the highest at 211.30 MPa, and that of the 4 mm-Lava Ultimate group was the lowest at 11.56 MPa; the highest dentin stress was 38.84 MPa in the 3 mm-Lava Ultimate group, and the lowest was 11.68 MPa in 1 mm-Cercon group. The stress in the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone had little change. The inclined loading analysis showed that the crown stress of the 1 mm-Cercon group was the highest at 78.73 MPa and that of the 1 mm-Lava Ultimate group was the lowest at 35.51 MPa; the highest dentin stress was 41.63 MPa in the 1 mm-Cercon cervical group, and the lowest was 10.81 MPa in the 4 mm-Cercon coronal group. The stress concentration of cement and cervical dentin under inclined loading was higher than that under vertical loading.@* Conclusion @# The results of finite element analysis show that the elastic modulus of the endocrown increases, the stress of the crown restoration shows an upward trend, and the stress in the tooth shows a downward trend. With increasing crown thickness, the stress of the crown prosthesis decreased.

Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To evaluate the influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns using three-dimensional finite element analysis.@*METHODS@#A maxillary second premolar was scanned by Micro-CT and a three-dimensional finite element model of ceramic endocrown with 1 mm thickness of base was established. A model without base was also established as a negative control. Four kinds of conventional base materials with different elastic modulus were adopted: light cure glass ionomer(3M Vitrebond, 3 657 MPa), flowable composite resin(3M Filtek Z350XT Flowable Restorative, 7 300 MPa), high strength glass ionomer(GC Fuji Ⅸ, 13 130 MPa), and posterior composite resin(3M Filtek P60, 19 700 MPa). With a 200 N force loaded vertically and obliquely, the distribution and magnitude of stress in the tooth tissue and adhesive layer were investigated by three-dimensional finite element analysis.@*RESULTS@#The maximum von Mises stress values(vertical/oblique) in dentin and adhesive layer were measured as follows: (1) no base material: 19.39/70.49 MPa in dentin and 6.97/17.97 MPa in adhesive layer; (2) light cure glass ionomer: 19.00/69.75 MPa in dentin and 6.87/16.30 MPa in adhesive layer; (3) flowable composite resin: 18.78/69.33 MPa in dentin and 6.79/16.17 MPa in adhesive layer; (4) high strength glass ionomer: 18.71/69.20 MPa in dentin and 6.74/16.07 MPa in adhesive layer; (5) posterior composite resin: 18.61/69.03 MPa in dentin and 6.70/16.01 MPa in adhesive layer. Under the same loading condition, models with different elastic moduli of base materials had similar stress distribution patterns. The von Mises stress of tooth tissue was mainly concentrated in the tooth cervix. Under oblique load, the regions where von Mises stress concentrated in were similar to those under a vertical load, but the values increased. The stress concentration in the tooth cervix was alleviated in models with base materials compared with the model without base material. The maximum von Mises stress in the tooth tissue and adhesive layer decreased when the elastic modulus of base materials increased and got close to that of dentin.@*CONCLUSION@#The posterior composite resin of which the elastic moduli is high and close to that of dentin is recommended as base material for premolar endocrowns to alleviate the concentration of stress in tooth cervix and adhesive layer.

Fracture resistance of primary molars restored with endocrowns versus zirconia crowns (an in vitro study) / Resistência à fratura de molares decíduos restaurados com endocrowns versus coras de zircônia (um estudo in vitro)

Objective: This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of primary molars restored with endocrowns compared to prefabricated zirconia crowns. Material and Methods: Twelve sound, defect-free primary second molars were selected and divided into two groups: group I included 6 molars restored with zirconia crowns, while group II included 6 teeth restored with endocrowns. For both groups access cavity was prepared for the teeth to open pulp chamber. Fracture resistance of both groups was tested using a universal testing machine. Results: Zirconia crown showed statistically significantly higher mean fracture resistance than Endocrown (P-value = 0.001, Effect size = 2.72). Conclusion: Pulpotomized primary molars restored with Zirconia crowns showed significantly higher mean fracture resistance compared to primary molars restored with endocrowns, meanwhile both restorations have shown higher mean fracture resistance than the maximum biting force in children. (AU)

Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a resistência à fratura de molares decíduos restaurados com endocrowns em comparação com coroas de zircônia pré-fabricadas. Material e Métodos: Doze segundos molares decíduos hígidos e livres de defeitos foram selecionados e divididos em dois grupos: o grupo l incluiu 6 molares restaurados com coroas de zircônia, enquanto o grupo ll incluiu 6 dentes restaurados com edocrowns. Para ambos os grupos, foi preparada uma cavidade de acesso à câmara pulpar. A resistência à fratura de ambos os grupos foi testada em uma máquina de ensaio universal. Resultados: A coroa de zircônia apresentou resistência média à fratura estatisticamente significativa maior do que endocrown (p=0,001, Tamanho do efeito = 2,72). Conclusão: Molares decíduos pulpotomizados restaurados com coroas de zircônia apresentam resistência média à fratura significativamente maior em comparação aos molares decíduos restaurados com endocrowns, entretanto, ambas as restaurações mostraram maior média à fratura do que a força máxima de mordida em crianças (AU)

Fracture Resistance of Anterior CAD/CAM Nanoceramic Resin Endocrowns with Different Preparation Designs / Resistência à Fratura de Endocrowns de Resina Nanocerâmica CAD / CAM Anterior Com Diferentes Projetos de Preparação

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of extension of endocrown in pulp space and the effect of ferrule on the fracture resistance of anterior endocrowns made of nano-ceramic resin blocks. Material and Methods: Twenty-eight freshly extracted human upper central incisor teeth were prepared to receive CAD/CAM nanoceramic resin endocrowns with four different designs. The specimens were divided into two groups (n = 14) according to the extension of the endocrown inside root canal (A:short and B:long), then each group was further subdivided into another two subgroups (n = 7) according to the presence or absence of ferrule effect (1:ferrule and 2: no ferrule). Endocrowns were then fabricated using CEREC in lab and nanoceramic resin blocks (DENTSPLY Sirona, Germany) and LAVA ultimate (3M ESPE, Germany) blocks size 14L. Results: Two-way ANOVA showed that the ferrule (p > 0.0001) had statistically significant effect on the fracture resistance. However, the extension of the endocrown into the canal had no statistical significant effect on the fracture resistance (p = 0.837). The interactions between the independent variables (extension into the canal and ferrule) had statistically significant effect on the fracture resistance (p = 0.029). Load to fracture for group 1A was 439.53 N, 1B was 306.46 N, 2A was 516.29 N and 2B was 242.04 N. Conclusions: Fracture resistance was not improved by the long or short extensions of the endocrowns in the pulp space, however, the ferrule effect shows significant improvement of the fracture resistance of the nanoceramic resin endocrowns. (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da extensão da coroa endocrown na câmara pulpar e o efeito férula na resistência à fratura de coroas endocrowns anteriores confeccionadas através de blocos de resina nanocerâmica. Material e Métodos: Vinte e oito dentes incisivos centrais superiores humanos recém-extraídos foram preparados para receber endocrowns de resina nanocerâmica CAD / CAM com quatro diferentes tipos de preparos. Os espécimes foram divididos em dois grupos (n = 14) de acordo com a extensão da endocrown dentro do canal radicular (A: curto e B: longo), então cada grupo foi subdividido em outros dois subgrupos (n = 7) de acordo com presença ou ausência do efeito férula (1: com férula e 2: sem férula). As endocrowns foram usinadas através do CEREC In Lab e blocos de resina nanocerâmica (DENTSPLY Sirona, Alemanha) e blocos de LAVA ultimate (3M ESPE, Alemanha) tamanho 14L. Resultados: ANOVA dois fatores demostrou que a férula (P> 0,0001) teve efeito estatisticamente significativo na resistência à fratura. No entanto, a extensão do endocrown no canal não teve efeito estatisticamente significativo na resistência à fratura (P = 0,837). As interações entre as variáveis independentes (extensão no canal e férula) tiveram efeito estatisticamente significativo na resistência à fratura (P = 0,029). A carga para fratura do grupo 1A foi de 439,53 N, 1B foi de 306,46 N, 2A foi de 516,29 N e 2B foi de 242,04 N. Conclusões: A resistência à fratura não foi melhorada pelas extensões longas ou curtas das endocrowns na câmara pulpar, no entanto, o efeito férula mostrou uma melhora significativa na resistência à fratura das coroas endocrowns de resina nanocerâmica (AU)

A one-year clinical evaluation of IPS E. max press versus CERASMART endocrowns in anterior endodontically treated teeth: a randomised clinical / Avaliação clínica de um ano de IPS E. max Press versus CERASMART endocrowns em dentes anteriores tratados endodonticamente: um ensaio clínico randomizado

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare gross fracture, patient satisfaction and marginal adaptation of anterior endocrowns restoring endodontically treated anterior teeth fabricated from IPS e.max press and CERASMART hybrid ceramics. Material and Methods: A total of 24 patients were selected to receive an aesthetic endocrown for an upper tooth in the aesthetic zone (central incisor, lateral and canine).The 24 patients were divided into two groups (n= 12 each), where Group 1, the control group, received an IPS e.max press anterior endocrown and Group 2, theintervention group, received a CERASMART anterior endocrown. After cementation all patients were followed up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. During each follow-up examination, United States Public Health Servicecriteria were adopted for clinical evaluation to score margin integrity and gross fracture. Questionnaires were also used to evaluate the patients' satisfaction and potential postoperative discomfort. The X2 or Fisher's Exact test were used to compare qualitative variables in the two groups and Friedman's test was used to study the changes over time within each group. The significance level was set at P≤ 0.05. Results: With regard to gross fracture and marginal integrity, there was no statistically significant difference at any time interval between IPS e.max press and CERASMART endocrowns. All patients reported being satisfied with their restorations until the end of the follow-up period. Conclusions: CERASMART anterior endocrowns provided a promising treatment modality compared to IPS e.max press anterior endocrowns. (AU)

Objetivo: o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar e comparar a fratura grosseira, a satisfação do paciente e a adaptação marginal de endocrowns em dentes anteriores tratados endodonticamente, fabricados a partir de IPS e.max press e cerâmicas híbridas CERASMART. Material e Métodos: Um total de 24 pacientes foi selecionado para receber endocrown em um dente superior na zona estética (incisivo central, lateral e canino). Os 24 pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos (n = 12 cada), onde o Grupo 1, o grupo controle, recebeu uma endocrown anterior IPS e.max press e o Grupo 2, o grupo de intervenção, recebeu uma endocrown anterior CERASMART. Após a cimentação, todos os pacientes foram acompanhados em 3, 6, 9 e 12 meses. Durante cada exame de acompanhamento, os critérios do Serviço de Saúde Pública dos Estados Unidos foram adotados para avaliação clínica para pontuar integridade de margem e fratura grosseira. Questionários também foram usados para avaliar a satisfação dos pacientes e potencial desconforto pós-operatório. O teste X2 ou teste de Fisher foi usado para comparar as variáveis qualitativas nos dois grupos, e o teste de Friedman foi usado para estudar as mudanças ao longo do tempo dentro de cada grupo. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em P≤ 0,05. Resultados: Com relação à fratura grosseira e integridade marginal, não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa em qualquer intervalo de tempo entre os endocrowns IPS e.max press e CERASMART. Todos os pacientes relataram estar satisfeitos com suas restaurações até o final do período de acompanhamento. Conclusão: os endocrowns anteriores CERASMART proporcionaram uma modalidade de tratamento promissora em comparação com os endocrowns anteriores IPS e.max press. (AU)

One year clinical evaluation of e-max press crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post versus e-max press endocrowns in anterior endodontically treated teeth (a randomized clinical trial) / Avaliação clínica de um ano de coroas e-max retidas com resina composta reforçada por fibra versus endocrowns de e-max em dentes anteriores tratados endodonticamente: um ensaio clínico randomizado

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient satisfaction, gross fracture and marginal adaptation of e.max press endocrowns versus e.max press crowns retained with Fiber reinforced composite post (FRCP) and core in upper anterior teeth. Material and methods: The present study included 24 patients seeking root canal treatment in anterior upper arch. The patients received root canal treatment (RCT) then they were randomly assigned into two groups (n=12). The first group received preparation for the IPS e.max crowns retained with FRCP and core and the second group received preparation for the IPS e.max endocrowns. Press technique was used for the fabrication of both restorations using IPS e.max press ingots. Marginal integrity and gross fracture were evaluated using USPHS criteria and a questionnaire was conducted to evaluate patient satisfaction. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Results: There was no statistical significant difference regarding gross fracture of both groups after 12 months (p-value = 0.093, Effect size = 0.447), meanwhile; group 1 was statistically significantly higher than group 2 regarding marginal integrity (p-value = 0.037, Effect size = 0.513). Regarding patient satisfaction FRCP and core group showed statistical significant higher satisfaction than endocrown group (p-value = 0.047, Effect size = 0.447). Conclusion: E.max press endocrowns revealed successful performance similar to e.max press crowns retained with FRCP in terms of gross fracture, however better marginal adaptation and patient satisfaction was obtained with e.max press crowns retained with FRC post and core group. (AU)

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a satisfação do paciente, grau de fratura grosseira e adaptação marginal de endocrowns e.max versus coroas de e.max retidas com pino de compósito reforçado com fibra (FRCP) e núcleo nos dentes anteriores superiores. Material e métodos: O presente estudo incluiu 24 pacientes que buscavam tratamento endodôntico na arcada superior anterior. Os pacientes receberam tratamento de canal radicular (RCT) e foram divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos (n = 12). O primeiro grupo recebeu preparação para as coroas IPS e.max retidas com FRCP e núcleo e o segundo grupo recebeu preparos para as endocrowns IPS e.max. A técnica de prensagem foi usada para a fabricação de ambas as restaurações usando os lingotes de prensagem IPS e.max. A integridade marginal e a fratura macroscópica foram avaliadas usando os critérios da USPHS e um questionário foi realizado para avaliar a satisfação do paciente. Os dados foram analisados usando IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, versão 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Resultados: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa em relação à fratura bruta de ambos os grupos após 12 meses (p-valor = 0,093, tamanho do efeito = 0,447), entretanto; o grupo 1 foi estatisticamente significativamente maior do que o grupo 2 em relação à integridade marginal (p-valor = 0,037, tamanho do efeito = 0,513). Em relação à satisfação do paciente, o FRCP e o grupo principal mostraram maior satisfação estatisticamente significativa do que o grupo endocrown (p-valor = 0,047, tamanho do efeito = 0,447). Conclusão: as endocrowns E.max press revelaram um desempenho bem-sucedido semelhante às coroas e.max press retidas com FRCP em termos de fratura bruta, no entanto, melhor adaptação marginal e satisfação do paciente foram obtidas com as coroas e.max press retidas com pilar FRC e núcleo de preenchimento (AU)

Endocrown: una alternativa rehabilitadora a las restauraciones rígidas totales clásicas / Endocrown: a rehabilitative alternative to

La restauración ideal en los dientes tratados endodónticamente (DTE) ha sido un tema controversial y ampliamente discutido en la literatura odontológica. El alto índice de fracasos en los dientes endodónticos se asocia principalmente a la falta de un adecuado sellado coronario, motivo por el cual la restauración post endodóntica cumple un papel fundamental. Los propios tejidos del DTE constituyen el refuerzo más importante de la pieza dentaria. La odontología considerada hoy en día como ideal es la mínimamente invasiva. A su vez la restauración de elección deberá ser aquella que respete mayor cantidad de tejido remanente a la hora de seleccionar la restauración coronaria. Se deberá considerar la cantidad y la calidad del remanente dentario sano, como los requisitos funcionales de cada pieza en particular. Si bien existen diversos tipos de restauraciones que podrían rehabilitar un DTE, en este trabajo sólo nos referiremos a las de inserción rígida, específicamente a las endo-onlays, también denominadas endocrowns (AU)

Effect of occlusal thickness design on the fracture resistance of endocrowns restored with lithium disilicate ceramic and zirconia / 华西口腔医学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#This study aimed to investigate the effect of occlusal thickness design on fracture resistance of endocrowns restored with lithium disilicate ceramic and zirconia.@*METHODS@#A total of 24 artificial first mandibular molars were randomly divided into four groups with six teeth in each group as follows: group lithium disilicate ceramic-2 mm (lithium disilicate ceramic, with an occlusal thickness of 2 mm and a retainer length of 4 mm); group lithium disilicate ceramic-4 mm (lithium disilicate ceramic, with an occlusal thickness of 4 mm and a retainer length of 2 mm); group zirconia-2 mm (zirconia, with an occlusal thickness of 2 mm and a retainer length of 4 mm); and group zirconia-4 mm (zirconia, with an occlusal thickness of 4 mm and a retainer length of 2 mm). After adhesive cementation (RelyX Ultimate Clicker), all specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10 000 cycles). The specimens were subjected to fracture resistance testing at a 135° angle to the teeth at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm·min⁻¹ in a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test by SPSS 15.0. The failure modes were classified.@*RESULTS@#The fracture resistances of groups lithium disilicate ceramic-
2 mm, lithium disilicate ceramic-4 mm, zirconia-2 mm, and zirconia-4 mm were (890.54±83.41), (2 320.87±728.57), 
(2 258.05±557.66), and (3 847.70±495.99) N respectively. Group zirconia-4 mm had the highest fracture resistance, whereas group lithium disilicate ceramic-2 mm had the lowest.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The fracture resistance of molar endocrown with zirconia is higher than that with lithium disilicate ceramic. Increasing the occlusal thickness can improve the fracture resistance but increase the risk of fracture of abutment.

Finite-element analysis of mandibular first molar with two marginal designs of endocrown for the repair of different defects / 华西口腔医学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#This study aimed to evaluate the stress distribution of the mandibular first molar with different thicknesses and heights of the axial wall restored by the endocrown with two marginal designs and thus provide a theoretical basis for selecting clinical preparation through the finite-element method.@*METHODS@#Two marginal endocrowns of the mandibular first molar with different axial-wall thicknesses (t=1, 2, 3 mm) and heights (h=2, 3, 4 mm) were established. Group A was the butt-joint design, whereas group B was the shoulder-surrounded design. After applying vertical and oblique loads , the size and distribution of the maximum principal stress and equivalent stress of residual tooth tissue were recorded.@*RESULTS@#The maximum principal stress and equivalent stress distribution of residual tooth tissue were similar among different models. Group A showed a lower maximum principal stress and equivalent stress than group B at the same thickness and height under vertical load. Meanwhile, under oblique load, the maximum principal stress values of groups A and B decreased with increased thickness at constant height. Group A showed lower equivalent stress than group B at the same thickness and height of 2 and 
3 mm. However, when the height was 4 mm, the trend was reversed.@*CONCLUSIONS@#In mastication, when bearing the vertical force, the retention of the butt-joint marginal endocrown preferred to the shoulder-surrounded one. Given the higher axial wall of the shoulder-surrounded marginal endocrown, it showed better ability to bear the oblique force than the butt-joint one.

Post-endodontic Restoration on Erupting Permanent First Molars Using Endocrown with a Polyglass Composite Resin: Report of Two Cases / 대한소아치과학회지

Post-endodontic restorations are both important and challenging for clinical success in endodontically treated posterior teeth. Several options have been proposed to restore endodontically treated molars.In pediatric dentistry, restoration using conventional single crowns, especially for partially erupted molars with insufficient retentive tooth structure, has proven to be difficult. However, the endocrown presents a conservative and esthetic restorative alternative to conventional crowns with post-and-core, as it acquires additional retention within the pulp chamber. The tooth preparation consists of a circular, equigingival, butt-joint margin and a central retention cavity in the pulp chamber that helps to construct both the crown and core as a single unit.This case report describes the esthetic and conservative endocrown restorations of erupting permanent first molars with extensive coronal destruction.

Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with more than one cusp missing and thin remaining walls is challenging for the general practitioner. The use of posts combined with full coverage restorations is a well-established approach, yet not following the minimal invasive principles of adhesive dentistry. Endocrowns are indirect monoblock restorations that use the pulp chamber of the ETT for retention. In this study the fabrication of 4 endocrowns and their clinical performance will be discussed. Two clinical cases include computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing manufactured molar endocrowns (one feldspathic ceramic and one hybrid composite-ceramic restoration) and the other two are dental laboratory manufactured resin composite premolar endocrown restorations. The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used to assess the clinical behavior of the restorations at different follow up periods. Endocrown restorations present a satisfactory clinical alternative, either by the use of resin composite or glass ceramic and hybrid materials. Specific guidelines with minimal alterations should be followed for an endocrown restoration to be successful. Due to limited evidence regarding the long term evaluation of this restorative technique, a careful selection of cases should be applied.

A comparison of the fracture resistances of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with endocrowns and glass fiber post-core retained conventional crowns

PURPOSE: This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate the fracture resistances and failure modes of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with endocrowns and conventional post-core retained crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty mandibular premolars were assigned into three groups (n=10): GI, intact teeth; GE, teeth with endocrowns; GC, teeth with conventional post-core supported crowns. Except for the teeth in group GI, all specimens were cut to 1.5 mm above the cementoenamel junction and endodontically treated. Both endocrowns and conventional crowns were fabricated from lithium-disilicate blocks using a CEREC 3D CAD/CAM unit. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling and then to 45° oblique compressive load until fracture occurred. The fracture resistance and failure mode of each specimen were recorded. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and LSD Post Hoc Test (α=.05). RESULTS: The fracture resistances of GE and GC were significantly lower than that of GI (P<.01), while no significant difference was found between GE and GC (P=.702). As of the failure mode, most of the specimens in GE and GC were unfavorable while a higher occurrence of favorable failure mode was presented in GI. CONCLUSION: For the restoration of mandibular premolar, endocrown shows no advantage in fracture resistance when compared with the conventional method. Both of the two methods cannot rehabilitate endodontically treated teeth with the same fracture resistances that intact mandibular premolars have.

Avaliação de núcleo metálico fundido, núcleo com fibra de vidro e endocrown em cerâmica: análise comparativa pelo método dos elementos finitos 3D e ensaio mecânico / Evaluation of metal core, glass fiber post and ceramic endocrown: comparation between a 3D finite elements analysis and mechanical test

Dentes tratados endodonticamente têm uma maior incidência a fraturas, tornando sua restauração um desafio para a Odontologia. Foram selecionados três incisivos centrais superiores humanos os quais foram restaurados com núcleo metálico fundido e coroa de cerâmica IPS emax®Press, núcleo de preenchimento em resina ccomposta associado ao pino de fibra de vidro e coroa de cerâmica IPS emax®Press e endocrown em cerâmica IPS emax®Press. Os dentes foram levados ao teste estático de fratura. Paralelamente foi realizado um modelo virtual de um incisivo central que apresentava características e restaurações representativas dos dentes que foram levados ao teste de fratura. A análise computacional pelo método dos elementos finitos 3D foi realizada. Os resultados obtidos nos dois tipos de análise realizada mostram que a coroa endocrown e o pino de fibra de vidro apresentaram um padrão de fratura que não afetou a estrutura radicular enquanto que o núcleo metálico fundido apresentou um padrão de fratura desfavorável envolvendo a estrutura radicular condenando o dente. Na análise dos elementos finitos obtivemos uma correta previsibilidade de onde as coroas e núcleos poderiam falhar. A análise dos elementos finitos é uma metodologia importante na análise de novas técnicas e novos materiais.

Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is a common problem in restorative dentistry, related to the fractures occurring in such teeth. Three human maxillary central incisor were selected and restaured with metal core and IPS emax®ceramic crown, glass fiber post with composite core and IPS emax®ceramic crown and IPS emax®ceramic endocrown. Static loading test were performed on each specimen until failure. Paralleled a 3D model of a maxillary central incisor is presented. The same characteristics of the real teeth used in the mechanical test were applied. A 3D finite elements analysis was made. The results of both analysis shows that endocrown and fiber post have a pattern of fracture that not involve the root while metal core presents a catastrophic pattern of fracture in the root. The FEM analysis is an important methodology in the development of new materials.

Stress distribution of endodontically treated maxillary second premolars restored with different methods: Three-dimensional finite element analysis / 대한치과보존학회지

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of elastic modulus of restorative materials and the number of interfaces of post and core systems on the stress distribution of three differently restored endodontically treated maxillary second premolars using 3D FE analysis. Model 1, 2 was restored with a stainless steel or glass fiber post and direct composite resin. A PFG or a sintered alumina crown was considered. Model 3 was restored by EndoCrown. An oblique 500 N was applied on the buccal (Load A) and palatal (Load B) cusp. The von Mises stresses in the coronal and root structure of each model were analyzed using ANSYS. The elastic modulus of the definitive restorations rather than the type of post and core system was the primary factor that influenced the stress distribution of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. The stress concentration at the coronal structure could be lowered through the use of definitive restoration of high elastic modulus. The stress concentration at the root structure could be lowered through the use of definitive restoration of low elastic modulus.